Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;8:7576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26049-5

Table 1.

Effect of plasma exposure for different durations on chicken sperm quality.

Exposure duration (s) Sperm
count ×109/ml
Sperm viability (%) Sperm motility (%) Acrosome integrity (%) DNA integrity (%) Total fertility (%)
0 2.77 ± 0.05 85.21 ± 2.09 36.84 ± 1.35 35.35 ± 0.20 98.00 ± 0.41 84.00 ± 3.27
10 2.79 ± 0.01 85.06 ± 1.01 42.17 ± 1.85** 35.13 ± 2.63 97.17 ± 0.62 88.00 ± 3.27
20 2.78 ± 0.07 85.11 ± 0.56 45.42 ± 2.23** 35.23 ± 1.27 97.67 ± 0.24 89.33 ± 4.99
40 2.76 ± 0.08 84.16 ± 2.54 42.36 ± 1.75** 34.14 ± 1.93 97.00 ± 0.41 85.33 ± 1.89
60 2.77 ± 0.03 76.26 ± 2.89** 30.67 ± 1.19** 30.95 ± 1.86* 82.00 ± 0.82** 70.67 ± 4.99**
80 2.77 ± 0.06 66.23 ± 1.43** 25.58 ± 0.97** 27.44 ± 0.94** 66.33 ± 0.85** 54.67 ± 3.77**

Plasma exposure intensity was 11.7 kV. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 10) of three replicates; n represents an individual cock. Within a column: *p < 0.05 versus control; **p < 0.01 versus control, according to one-way ANOVA and LSD test.