Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 1;45(7):1079–1090. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7

Table 4.

Concordance between FFR and MFR by PET and CZT in 90 artery territories in 30 patients

N = 90 FFR ≤ 0.8 FFR > 0.8
CZT-SPECT MFR < 2.1 7 12
CZT-SPECT MFR ≥ 2.1 5 66
PET MFR < 2 8 9
PET MFR ≥ 2 4 69
MFR vs. FFR PET MFR < 2 CZT-SPECT < 2.1
Accuracy 86.7% 81.1%
Sensitivity (%) 66.7% 58.3%
Specificity (%) 88.5% 84.6%
Positive predictive value (%) 47.1% 36.8%
Negative predictive value (%) 94.5% 93%