Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 23;36(6):645–661. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0642-5

Table 4.

Results of the floor and ceiling effects

MO SC UA PD AD ‘33333’/
‘55555’
Floor
 Range of floor effects for the 3L (%) 0–3.8 0–4.9 0–10.9 0–26.1 0–7.3 0–2.7
 Range of floor effects for the 5L (%) 0–3.0 0–3.7 0–6.5 0–5.7 0–2.5 0–1.8
 Range of absolute reduction in floor effects (percentage points) −0.9 to 1.7 −0.3 to 1.2 −1.7 to 6.3 0–20.4 0–4.8 0–0.9
 Mean absolute reduction in floor effects (percentage points) 0.14 0.25 1.43 4.29 1.64 0.21
 Number of studies reporting on floor effects 18 18 18 18 18 5
 Number of studies reporting lower floor effects for the 5L than for the 3L 7 6 13 16 14 3
MO SC UA PD AD ‘11111’
Ceiling
 Range of ceiling effects for the 3L (%) 10.2–97.7 61.4–99.5 10.8–94.8 2.3–80.3 24.5–88.0 0.6–68.0
 Range of ceiling effects for the 5L (%) 4.0–96.5 60.2–99.5 9.1–93.1 0.6–71.2 17.9–82.0 0–55.0
 Range of absolute reduction in ceiling effects (percentage points) −0.25 to 16.9 −1.3 to 30.0 0.8–21.3 1.5–20.0 −3.4 to 19.7 −0.5 to 16.7
 Mean absolute reduction in ceiling effects (percentage points) 5.73 4.15 4.88 6.77 6.17 6.50
 Number of studies reporting on ceiling effects 20 20 20 20 20 22
 Number of studies reporting lower ceiling effects for the 5L than for the 3L 19 16 20 20 18 19
 Number of studies reporting <15% ceiling for the 3L/5L 1/2 0/0 1/2 3/3 0/0 7/8

The absolute reduction in floor effects was calculated by subtracting the number or percentage of the reported highest level of problems/‘55555’ for the 5L by the number or percentage of the reported highest level of problems/‘33333’ for the 3L, respectively. The absolute reduction in ceiling effects was calculated by subtracting the number or percentage of reported ‘no problems’/‘11111’ for the 5L by the number or percentage of reported ‘no problems’/‘11111’ for the 3L, respectively

MO Mobility, SC Self-Care, UA Usual Activities, PD Pain/Discomfort, AD Anxiety/Depression