Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;19(Suppl 2):101. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4467-6

Table 3.

The performance of the two models on the training set and our final selected model on the test set, evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), specificity and, sensitivity

LOPO CV Independent Testing
Ensemble Model Penalized Logistic Model Penalized Logistic Model
Sample-level In silico mixing Sample-level In silico mixing In vitro mixing
AUC 0.90
[0.87–0.93]
0.93
[0.88–0.98]
0.87
[0.83–0.91]
0.91
[0.85–0.97]
0.87
[0.76–0.98]
Specificity 0.92
[0.86–0.96]
0.95
[0.82–0.99]
0.91
[0.85–0.95]
0.95
[0.82–0.99]
0.88
[0.70–0.98]
Sensitivity 0.73
[0.67–0.79]
0.79
[0.66–0.89]
0.71
[0.64–0.77]
0.72
[0.58–0.83]
0.70
[0.47–0.87]