Table 4.

Physical position, P-value, effect, and distance to known QTL or known genes of QTN for flowering time (R1) and maturity (R7 and R8) detected using FarmCPU.

Chr	Position	LG	Average of P. value	Average of effect	Distance to known QTL or gene (Kb)	QTL in SoyBase or known gene
3	1094352	N	4.05 × 10−3	−2.38	4,570	Pod maturity19-3 (Guzman et al., 2007)
4	6130517	C1	4.36 × 10−3	2.94	266	Pod maturity 1-1 (Keim et al., 1990)
4	36583411	C1	1.78 × 10−3	−2.66
4	39484122	C1	4.23 × 10−3	0.46
6	10919417	C2	1.29 × 10−3	2.47	2,130	Pod maturity13-3 (Specht et al., 2001)
7	4918268	M	2.20 × 10−6	−5.99	92	First flower 2-2 (Mansur et al., 1993).
7	4928246	M	4.40 × 10−6	8.22	82.45	First flower 2-2 (Mansur et al., 1993)
7	8251563	M	3.16 × 10−3	4.01	2,260	First flower 6-2 (Orf et al., 1999)
8	18036672	A2	3.92 × 10−3	3.74
9	49446558	K	1.02 × 10−3	−2.07	4,730	First flower 24-4 (Kuroda et al., 2013)
10	45054578	O	7.56 × 10−6	7.40	240	E2 (Watanabe et al., 2011)
11	10752436	B1	2.97 × 10−4	3.66	83.7	First flower 11-2 (Gai et al., 2007)
11	28002694	B1	2.70 × 10−3	2.42	966	First flower 8-4 (Yamanaka et al., 2001)
12	37271658	H	9.74 × 10−4	3.74$	535	Pod maturity 37-3 (Panthee et al., 2007)
14	5766604	B2	8.81 × 10−4	5.52
14	44255110	B2	2.98 × 10−4	−4.11	540	First flower 21-1 (Reinprecht et al., 2006)
15	1348441	E	1.22 × 10−3	−4.14	1,170	Pod maturity 34-4 (Yao et al., 2015)
16	2643365	J	3.94 × 10−3	−1.58	995	Pod maturity 19-6 (Guzman et al., 2007)
16	3623089	J	4.29 × 10−3	3.09	89	GmFT5a (Takeshima et al., 2016)
17	5422636	D2	4.14 × 10−3	−2.19
18	1883973	G	2.18 × 10−5	−4.97	87.5	First flower 21-4 (Reinprecht et al., 2006)
18	3737376	G	3.52 × 10−3	2.42	3,290	Pod maturity 16-2 (Kabelka et al., 2004)
18	24606904	G	3.03 × 10−3	2.44	2,230	Pod maturity 34-5 (Yao et al., 2015)
18	45935966	G	3.68 × 10−3	−3.09	3,240	First flower 10-2 (Tasma et al., 2001)
19	35744249	L	9.82 × 10−6	−4.16	1,440	First flower 15-2 (Komatsu et al., 2007)
19	44839670	L	2.48 × 10−3	2.17	343	First flower 2-3 (Mansur et al., 1993)
19	46634511	L	2.84 × 10−3	−3.21	125	Pod maturity 4-3 (Mansur et al., 1996); First
					406	flower 16-4 (Khan et al., 2008)
19	46730237	L	2.77 × 10−3	0.27&	437	E3 (Watanabe et al., 2009)
20	36021032	I	4.61 × 10−4	2.48	821	E4 (Liu et al., 2008)

Only QTN that was detected more than three environments were listed.

^$Effect of−3.524 for R1_MDJ_2012 was not counted due to the oppositing effect;

^&effect of−6.267737 for R1_GZL_2011 was not counted due to the oppositing effect.