Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;9:668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00668

Table 2.

Comparison between G1 and G2 in the baseline (T1) and after 8 weeks (T2), when G1 received the intervention.

G1 (n = 22)
G2 2 (n = 22)
Time X Group Effect Effect Size (Time × Group) Observed Power (Time × Group)
T1 T2a T1 T2b

Average (SE) Average (SE) Average (SE) Average (SE) p
SRQ-20 6.92 (0.78) 3.96 (0.72) 6.64 (0.67) 5.71 (6.48) 0.023 0.092 0.634
BDI 12.28 (1.60) 6.24 (1.20) 12.16 (1.43) 10.38 (1.07) 0.024 0.091 0.626
BAI 11.40 (1.69) 5.40 (1.56) 12.07 (1.52) 12.10 (1.40) 0.004 0.140 0.830
MAAS 58.72 (3.21) 65.08 (3.23) 57.58 (2.88) 57.25 (2.90) 0.029 0.085 0.595
Digit-symbol 62.92 (3.80) 73.96 (3.71) 68.26 (3.41) 69.19 (3.34) 0.047 0.071 0.519
ISSL (last 24 h) 3.36 (0.50) 1.76 (0.38) 3.23 (0.45) 2.87 (0.34) 0.047 0.071 0.516
ISSL (last week) 4.92 (0.59) 2.16 (0.52) 4.94 (0.53) 4.42 (0.47) 0.003 0.157 0.876
ISSL (last month) 5.40 (0.76) 2.24 (0.61) 5.00 (0.68) 4.16 (0.55) 0.010 0.116 0.743

n, Number of participants; T1, baseline; T2, after 8 weeks; aevaluation immediately after intervention; bevaluation after 8 weeks without intervention; Size Effect, Partial Eta Squared (Less than 0.01 indicates a small effect size, 0.06 indicates a medium effect size and greater than 0.14 indicates a large effect size) (Cohen, 1973); SRQ-20, Self-Report Questionnaire; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; MAAS, Mindful Awareness Attention Scale; ISSL, Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory.