Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;9:668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00668

Table 3.

Comparison between G1 and G2 (from T2 to T3), after G2 had also received the intervention.

G1 (n = 22)
G2 2 (n = 22)
Time × Group Effect Effect Size (Time × Group) Observed Power (Time × Group)
T2 T3b T2 T3a

Average (SE) Average (SE) Average (SE) Average (SE) p
SRQ-20 4.39 (0.86) 4.72 (0.71) 5.37 (0.92) 2.93 (0.75) 0.002 0.253 0.891
BDI 6.50 (1.53) 6.78 (1.09) 10.56 (1.62) 5.88 (1.57) 0.011 0.186 0.746
BAI 6.00 (1.87) 7.27 (1.47) 10.50 (1.94) 6.87 (1.56) 0.072 0.097 0.438
MAAS 62.61 (3.74) 60.27 (3.97) 55.43 (3.97) 62.63 (4.19) 0.009 0.196 0.773
Digit-symbol 75.00 (4.38) 83.78 (4.12) 73.19 (4.65) 83.19 (4.37) 0.826 0.002 0.055
ISSL (last 24 h) 1.83 (0.46) 1.72 (0.37) 3.19 (0.49) 2.19 (0.39) 0.231 0.044 0.220
ISSL (last week) 2.28 (0.61) 2.61 (0.44) 4.63 (0.65) 2.00 (0.46) 0.003 0.249 0.884
ISSL (last month) 2.16 (0.73) 2.33 (0.47) 4.43 (0.78) 2.00 (0.49) 0.003 0.250 0.886

n, Number of participants; T2, after 8 weeks; T3, after 16 weeks; aevaluation immediately after intervention; bevaluation after 8 weeks without intervention; Size Effect, Partial Eta Squared (Less than 0.01 indicates a small effect size, 0.06 indicates a medium effect size and greater than 0.14 indicates a large effect size) (Cohen, 1973); SRQ-20, Self-Report Questionnaire; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; MAAS, Mindful Awareness Attention Scale; ISSL, Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory.