Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;9:668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00668

Table 4.

Comparison between results of the participants in the baseline (T1) and after both groups had received the intervention (T3).

G1 (n = 22)
G2 2 (n = 22)
Time Effect Effect Size (Time × Group) Observed Power (Time × Group)
T1 T3b T1 T3a

Average (SE) Average (SE) Average (SE) Average (SE) p
SRQ-20 7.47 (0.90) 4.79 (0.68) 6.13 (0.98) 2.93 (0.74) <0.001 0.395 0.995
BDI 13.21 (1.52) 6.68 (1.05) 10.56 (1.65) 5.87 (1.14) <0.001 0.454 0.999
BAI 12.36 (1.82) 7.57 (1.43) 10.62 (1.99) 6.87 (1.56) 0.003 0.232 0.866
MAAS 55.42 (3.21) 59.16 (3.87) 59.13 (3.50) 62.63 (4.22) 0.092 0.083 0.391
Digit-symbol 64.84 (4.30) 83.00 (3.99) 71.62 (4.68) 83.18 (4.35) <0.001 0.499 1.000
ISSL (last 24 h) 3.26 (0.52) 1.74 (0.35) 3.63 (0.57) 2.19 (0.39) 0.001 0.275 0.930
ISSL (last week) 5.00 (0.65) 2.58 (0.42) 5.19 (0.71) 2.00 (0.46) <0.001 0.476 1.000
ISSL (last month) 5.53 (0.87) 2.26 (0.45) 5.50 (0.95) 2.00 (0.49) <0.001 0.509 1.000

n, Number of participants; T1, baseline; T3, after 16 weeks; aevaluation immediately after intervention; bevaluation after 8 weeks without intervention; Size Effect, Partial Eta Squared (Less than 0.01 indicates a small effect size, 0.06 indicates a medium effect size and greater than 0.14 indicates a large effect size) (Cohen, 1973); SRQ-20, Self-Report Questionnaire; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; MAAS, Mindful Awareness Attention Scale; ISSL, Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory.