Table 1.
Results of employing a one compartment kinetic model to the PET and deconvolution model to the MR data (Eq. 1)
| PET | MR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P T | K 1 (ml/g/min) | K 1 SE (%) | k2 (l/min) | k 2 SE (%) | h(t = 0) (s−1) | h(t = 0) SE (%) |
| (ml/g/min) | ||||||
| 1 | 1.14 | 3.8 | 0.96 | 7.83 | 0.132 | 4.019 |
| 2 | 1.93 | 2 | 1.62 | 1.71 | 0.213 | 4.141 |
| 3 | 2.94 | 1.55 | 2.44 | 2.05 | 0.279 | 3.346 |
| 4 | 3.81 | 2.41 | 3.20 | 2.93 | 0.339 | 3.834 |
| 5 | 5.14 | 1.83 | 4.43 | 3.35 | 0.403 | 2.985 |
| REPEAT | ||||||
| 1 | 1.18 | 0.5 | 0.99 | 7.68 | 0.133 | 3.953 |
| 2 | 2.07 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.74 | 0.201 | 3.112 |
| 3 | 2.98 | 2.6 | 2.60 | 2.06 | 0.293 | 4.526 |
| 4 | 3.98 | 3.21 | 3.21 | 2.16 | 0.384 | 4.259 |
| 5 | 5.07 | 4.44 | 4.43 | 3.48 | 0.457 | 3.214 |