. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 Feb;27(2):923–937. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2768621

TABLE II.

Quantitative Comparison With Conventional Deformable Model

Organ	Method	DSC(%)	PPV(%)	SEN(%)	ASD(mm)
BS	DM	86.2±4.1	85.5±8.2	87.5±5.7	1.45±0.56
BS	PR	90.3±3.8	90.5±4.0	90.4±3.7	0.91±0.32

MA	DM	92.9±2.2	93.4±2.4	92.6±4.3	0.74±0.52
MA	PR	94.4±1.3	94.4±2.3	94.5±2.3	0.43±0.12

LP	DM	80.2±6.1	80.5±10.9	81.4±6.9	1.90±0.49
LP	PR	82.3±5.2	83.6±7.0	82.3±9.9	1.85±0.93

RP	DM	80.2±5.4	80.2±10.5	81.8±7.6	1.97±0.49
RP	PR	82.9±6.1	83.7±6.9	83.3±9.8	1.81±0.63

BS - Brainstem; MA - Mandible; LP - Left Parotid Gland; RP - Right Parotid Gland. DM - Conventional Deformable Model; PR - Proposed Method.