Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Jun;45(6):382–386. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000773

Table 2.

Multinomial logistic regression of MSM who never tested for syphilis or HIV, or ever tested for either HIV or syphilis, compared to men who had ever tested for both HIV and syphilis, China (2016)

Characteristic Never tested vs. ever tested for both HIV and syphilis Adjusted POR# (95% CI) P value Ever tested HIV only vs. ever tested for both HIV and syphilis Adjusted POR# (95% CI) P value
Sexual identity
- gay Reference Reference
- non-gay 1.86 (1.45–2.37)*** <0.001 1.16 (0.90–1.51) 0.25
Disclosed sexuality or sexual history with men (other than usual partner)
- Yes Reference Reference
- No 2.22 (1.75–2.78)*** <0.001 1.26 (0.98–1.61) 0.07
Disclosed sexuality or sexual history with health providers
- Yes Reference Reference
- No 11.11 (7.69–14.29)*** <0.001 2.95 (2.25–3.88)*** <0.001
Condomless sex with casual partner in the last 3 months
- Yes Reference Reference
- No 1.89 (1.37–2.56)*** <0.001 1.29 (0.96–1.73) 0.09
Ever had sex with female
- Yes Reference Reference
- No 1.27 (0.97–1.66) 0.09 1.06 (0.81–1.40) 0.66
Transactional sex
- Yes Reference Reference
- No 0.93 (0.67–1.30) 0.68 0.86 (0.62–1.20) 0.38
Community engagement in sexual health
- Substantial engagement Reference Reference
- Moderate engagement 1.39 (1.06–1.82)* 0.02 1.63 (1.26–2.10)*** <0.001
- Minimal engagement 6.93 (4.56–10.52)*** <0.001 2.96 (1.89–4.62)*** <0.001
- No engagement 15.16 (9.40–24.45)*** <0.001 5.62 (3.40–9.27)*** <0.001
Mainly meet partners
- online Reference Reference
- offline 1.49 (1.16–1.92)** <0.01 1.28 (0.98–1.67) 0.07
Anticipated HIV stigma 0.85 (0.72–1.01) 0.06 0.86 (0.73–1.03) 0.10
#

adjusted for age, education, income, household registration status,

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001,

POR= prevalence odds ratio, 95% CI = 95% confidence interval