Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 24;9(31):21861–21875. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25076

Table 3. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Univariable Multivariable
HR p-value 95% CI HR p-value 95% CI
Freedom from recurrence
 Histology (TC vs. Thymoma) 4.93 0.002 1.76–13.7 8.55 0.036 1.14–62.5
 Tumor Stage (I–II vs. III–IV) 2.60 0.066 0.94–7.14 0.68 0.673 0.12–4.02
 Fibrinogen (high vs. low) 2.86 0.053 0.99–8.26 1.40 0.601 0.40–4.95
 NLR (high vs. low) 3.95 0.014 1.32–11.7 3.14 0.145 0.67–14.7
 PLR (high vs. low) 2.00 0.259 0.60–6.67 0.44 0.350 0.08–2.46
Cause specific survival
 Histology (TC vs. Thymoma) 23.3 0.004 2.68–200.0 3.56 0.442 0.14–90.9
 Tumor Stage (I-II vs. III-IV) 12.35 0.022 1.43–111.1 3.10 0.459 0.16–62.5
 Fibrinogen (high vs. low) 17.24 0.012 1.87–166.7 9.09 0.149 0.45–166.7
 NLR (high vs. low) 62.5 0.265 0.04–100.0 0.61 0.677 0.06–6.10
 PLR (high vs. low) 2.83 0.257 0.47–16.5 1.07 0.963 1.00–1.60

Presented data indicate the prognostic impact of tested factors. Patients were dichotomized into high and low subgroups using cut-off values of 452.5 mg/dL for Fibrinogen, 4.0 for NLR, and 136.5 for PLR. TC, Thymic carcinoma; HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; NLR, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio; PLR, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.