Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0196467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196467

Table 1. Risk of bias assessment by the 7 key categories of the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

First author, year of publication Selection bias Attrition bias Reporting bias Performance bias Incomplete analysis according to group allocation Detection bias Other bias
Abbott, 2009 high risk high risk Unclear high risk low risk low risk low
Andersson, 2002 Unclear high risk Unclear low risk Unclear low risk high
Andersson, 2003 Unclear high risk Unclear low risk Unclear low risk high
Boer, de, 2014 high risk high risk Unclear Unclear high risk low risk high
Brattberg, 2006 low risk high risk Unclear Unclear Unclear low risk low
Buhrman, 2004 high risk high risk Unclear low risk Unclear low risk low
Buhrman, 2011 low risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low risk low
Buhrman, 2013a high risk high risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Buhrman, 2013b Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Buhrman, 2015 high risk   Unclear high risk low risk low risk low
Camerini, 2012 Unclear high risk Unclear high risk Unclear low risk low
Carpenter, 2012 Unclear high risk Unclear low risk Unclear low risk low
Chiauzzi, 2010 high risk high risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Davis, 2013 low risk Unclear Unclear high risk low risk low risk low
Dear, 2013 Unclear low risk low risk low risk low risk low risk low
Dear, 2015 low risk Unclear low risk low risk low risk low risk low
Devenini, 2005 Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear low
Dowd, 2015 Unclear high risk Unclear high risk low risk low risk low
Everitt, 2013 high risk Unclear low risk high risk low risk low risk low
Hesser, 2012 low risk low risk Unclear low risk low risk low risk low
Hunt, 2009 Unclear high risk Unclear high risk high risk low risk high
Hunt, 2015 Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear high risk low risk high
Janse, 2016 Unclear low risk low risk high risk low risk high risk low
Jasper, 2014 Unclear low risk low risk low risk low risk low risk low
Kaldo, 2008 Unclear low risk Unclear low risk low risk low risk high
Krein, 2013 low risk low risk   Unclear low risk low risk low
Kristjánsdóttir, 2013 low risk high risk Unclear low risk low risk low risk low
Lee, 2014 Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear Unclear low risk low
Ljotsson, 2010 Unclear low risk Unclear low risk low risk low risk low
Ljotsson, 2011a low risk low risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Ljotsson, 2011b low risk high risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Lorig, 2008 Unclear high risk low risk Unclear low risk low risk low
Menga, 2014 Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear Unclear low risk high
Moessner, 2014 Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Mourad, 2016 high risk low risk low risk low risk low risk low risk high
Naylor, 2008 low risk low risk Unclear low risk low risk low risk low
Oerlemans, 2011 high risk Unclear high risk low risk Unclear low risk low
Riva, 2014 low risk low risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Ruehlman, 2012 Unclear high risk Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low
Schulz, 2007 high risk low risk high risk high risk low risk low risk high
Strom, 2000 Unclear high risk Unclear high risk Unclear low risk high
Trompetter, 2015 Unclear high risk low risk high risk low risk low risk low
Vallejo, 2015 Unclear Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low risk high
Weise, 2016 Unclear low risk low risk low risk low risk low risk low
Williams, 2010 Unclear Unclear Unclear low risk low risk low risk low
Wilson, 2015 Unclear high risk Unclear high risk high risk low risk low

The 13 risk of bias criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group were combined into these 7 major categories of the general Cochrane risk of bias tool.