Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0196391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196391

Table 2. Validity task accuracy measures across channel, modality, and intensity.

Channel Modality Intensity N Mean (SD) Proportion correct Mean (SD) Unbiased hit rate Mean (SD) Intensity Mean (SD) Genu. Kappa
Speech AV Normal 768 0.77 (0.23) 0.57 (0.17) 3.44 (0.51) 3.47 (0.44) 0.62
Strong 672 0.83 (0.19) 0.62 (0.15) 4.01 (0.56) 3.56 (0.56) 0.71
VO Normal 768 0.70 (0.25) 0.52 (0.19) 3.40 (0.54) 3.42 (0.46) 0.53
Strong 672 0.75 (0.25) 0.56 (0.19) 3.88 (0.60) 3.55 (0.48) 0.62
AO Normal 758 0.58 (0.30) 0.43 (0.22) 3.14 (0.42) 3.12 (0.41) 0.41
Strong 672 0.67 (0.27) 0.50 (0.21) 3.71 (0.62) 3.51 (0.46) 0.52
Song AV Normal 552 0.77 (0.23) 0.57 (0.19) 3.37 (0.49) 3.33 (0.48) 0.61
Strong 460 0.84 (0.20) 0.63 (0.18) 3.91 (0.58) 3.46 (0.51) 0.72
VO Normal 552 0.75 (0.25) 0.55 (0.21) 3.41 (0.53) 3.36 (0.46) 0.61
Strong 460 0.79 (0.23) 0.59 (0.20) 3.89 (0.61) 3.54 (0.51) 0.67
AO Normal 552 0.53 (0.28) 0.39 (0.21) 3.13 (0.39) 3.24 (0.37) 0.31
Strong 460 0.62 (0.28) 0.47 (0.23) 3.55 (0.57) 3.37 (0.40) 0.44

Description of validity ratings for spoken and sung expressions, across channel, modality, and emotional intensity (N = 247 participants, each rating 298 stimuli). AV = audio-video; VO = video only; AO = audio only. As neutral had no intensity manipulation, neutral scores were collapsed into the ‘normal’ intensity category.