Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0195375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195375

Table 3. Environmental literacy and screening practices based on respondents’ specialty.

Characteristic Value OB/GYN
n = 195
Number (% of total)
Specialist
n = 72
Number (% of total)
Resident
n = 37
Number (% of total)
p
Read ACOG opinions/bulletins 181(93) 66(92) 37(100) 0.237
Do you routinely screen new patients for any of the following?
(Choose all that apply)
Prenatal vitamin use 177(91) 52(72) 33(89) < .001
Supplement use 146(75) 49(68) 21(57) 0.069
Tobacco use 183(94) 66(92) 36(97) 0.525
Alcohol use 179(92) 65(90) 35(95) 0.746
Exercise habits 139(71) 47(65) 21(57) 0.190
Dietary habits 129(66) 37(51) 17(46) 0.015
Domestic abuse 138(71) 48(67) 31(84) 0.168
Fish intake 59(30) 12(17) 1(3) < .001
Occupational exposures 45(23) 19(26) 2(5) 0.029
Environmental chemicals 17(9) 13(18) 3(8) 0.086
Other 9(5) 1(1) 1(3) 0.485
Which of the following environmental exposures do you routinely ask your patients about?
(Choose all that apply)
Lead exposure 27(14) 9(13) 3(8) 0.645
Mercury exposure 32(16) 6(8) 1(3) 0.030
Pesticide use 15(8) 8(11) 0(0) 0.120
Occupational exposure 62(32) 24(33) 5(14) 0.064
Air pollution exposure 23(12) 5(7) 1(3) 0.152
Plastics for food storage 1(1) 2(3) 2(5) 0.044
Water source 9(5) 3(4) 0(0) 0.516
Personal care products 15(8) 6(8) 0(0) 0.202
Household cleaners 12(6) 4(6) 0(0) 0.343
Knowledge to counsel environmental chemicals/adverse health 7(4) 2(3) 0(0) 0.557
Training to discuss with a patient how to reduce exposure 22(12) 5(7) 2(6) 0.356
Know where to refer a patient 55(30) 22(32) 2(6) 0.007
Comfort obtaining environmental history? 29(16) 11(16) 3(9) 0.552
Read Exposure to Toxic Environmental Agents (ACOG/ASRM) or FIGO Statement 21(12) 14(20) 1(3) 0.029

Values reported are frequency and column percentage. N = 8 providers not responding to questions about Practice Type omitted from Table 3.