Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197064

Table 1. Hazard ratios for 9 HT protocols relative to a control group consisting of women who did not take any HT, 95% confidence intervals for the hazard ratios, and p-values obtained using the one-sided log-rank test, where the null hypothesis is that the area under the survival curve for the control group is smaller than or equal to the area under the survival curve for the HT group.

HT Protocol HR (95% CI) p-Value # Cases # BC Cases (%)
CEE Alone 0.31 (0.25, 0.38) 1.00×10−16 2556 85 (3.33%)
MPA Alone 0.85 (0.50, 1.54) 0.28 442 14 (3.17%)
Other Synthetic Estrogen Alone 1.49 (1.25, 1.78) 3.48×10−6 1349 133 (9.86%)
Other Synthetic Progesterone Alone 0.64 (0.27, 1.56) 0.17 417 5 (1.12%)
Bioidentical Estrogen Alone 0.65 (0.49, 0.85) 0.00076 1441 55 (3.82%)
Bioidentical Progesterone Alone 1.18 (0.69, 2.04) 0.274 265 13 (4.91%)
CEE & MPA 0.43 (0.28, 0.67) 0.000087 453 20 (4.42%)
Other Synth. Estr. & Synth. Prog. 1.03 (0.84, 1.27) 0.38 2512 96 (3.82%)
Bioid. Estrogen & Bioid. Prog. 1.05 (0.59, 1.85) 0.438 288 12 (4.17%)

The number of controls was 27,642, and the number of controls realizing breast cancer was 2,399.