Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Nov 16;30(4):1371–1387. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001602

Table 1.

Standardized Regression Coefficients (Female/Male) for Growth Factors Regressed on EFs

Growth Factors Common EF Updating-Specific Shifting-Specific
Teacher ratings
 Intercept internalizing −.26*/−.24* .01/.01 .29*/−.17a
 Intercept externalizing .04/−.50*a .19*/.19* .14/.14
  Intercept r predicted −.01/.12* .00/.00 .04/−.02
 Slope internalizing .09 −.15 −.16
 Slope externalizing −.23 .08 .40*
  Slope r predicted −.02 −.01 −.06
Parent ratings
 Intercept internalizing −.17* −.09 .01
 Intercept externalizing −.04 .00 .25*
  Intercept r predicted .01 .00 .00
 Slope internalizing .22 .04 .10
 Slope externalizing −.14 −.01 −.10
  Slope r predicted −.03 .00 −.01

Note. Parent- and teacher-rating models were estimated separately. Unlesss noted, unstandardized parameters were constrained to be equal for males and females, but separate estimates are reported because standardized parameters differed slightly. Values in the “r predicted” rows describe the correlation between the internalizing and externalizing growth factors due to the common association with EF.

a

Parameters for males and females were significantly different so were freely estimated.

*

p<.05, and italics font indicates p<.10, as indicated by z-tests formed from the ratio of the parameter divided by its standard error.