Table 1.
Growth Factors | Common EF | Updating-Specific | Shifting-Specific |
---|---|---|---|
Teacher ratings | |||
Intercept internalizing | −.26*/−.24* | .01/.01 | .29*/−.17a |
Intercept externalizing | .04/−.50*a | .19*/.19* | .14/.14 |
Intercept r predicted | −.01/.12* | .00/.00 | .04/−.02 |
Slope internalizing | .09 | −.15 | −.16 |
Slope externalizing | −.23 | .08 | .40* |
Slope r predicted | −.02 | −.01 | −.06 |
Parent ratings | |||
Intercept internalizing | −.17* | −.09 | .01 |
Intercept externalizing | −.04 | .00 | .25* |
Intercept r predicted | .01 | .00 | .00 |
Slope internalizing | .22 | .04 | .10 |
Slope externalizing | −.14 | −.01 | −.10 |
Slope r predicted | −.03 | .00 | −.01 |
Note. Parent- and teacher-rating models were estimated separately. Unlesss noted, unstandardized parameters were constrained to be equal for males and females, but separate estimates are reported because standardized parameters differed slightly. Values in the “r predicted” rows describe the correlation between the internalizing and externalizing growth factors due to the common association with EF.
Parameters for males and females were significantly different so were freely estimated.
p<.05, and italics font indicates p<.10, as indicated by z-tests formed from the ratio of the parameter divided by its standard error.