Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;8:7714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25602-6

Table 2.

Comparison of particulate matter in all infusion combinations including the addition of IV in-line filtration.

Infusion set combination* Particulate contamination analysis Mean difference 95% confidence interval of difference Adjusted p-value
Combination 2 “with filter and CVC” vs. combination 4 “with filter only” Overall particulate matter 6,887 −6,761 to 20,536 0.4343
Particulate matter size ≥10 µm 29 −1,240 to 1,298 0.9982
Particulate matter size ≥25 µm 2 −11 to 14 0.9495
Combination 3 “with filter + extension line” vs. combination 4 “with filter only” Overall particulate matter 43,442 29,793 to 57,090 <0.0001
Particulate matter size ≥10 µm −3,513 −4,782 to −2,244 <0.0001
Particulate matter size ≥25 µm 22 10 to 34 0.0004
Combination 2 “with filter and CVC” vs. combination 3 “with filter and extension line” Overall particulate matter −36,554 −50,203 to −22,906 <0.0001
Particulate matter size ≥10 µm 3,513 2,244 to 4,782 <0.0001
Particulate matter size ≥25 µm −20 −33 to −8 0.0008

*Infusion set combinations are represented by the volume V, corresponding to the internal volume of the IV tubing between the in-line filter and the Qicpic particle counter, i.e. V = 0.8 mL, 1.7 mL and 0 mL for combinations 2, 3 and 4, respectively.