Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;8:7663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25999-0

Table 1.

Results of statistical comparisons between the two groups (Early PD patients/Controls) for each extracted feature, along with the percentage of times the feature was selected during the leave-one-subject-out validation process.

Feature NFT HT NP
Statistical Significance Times selected (%) Statistical Significance Times Selected (%) Statistical Significance Times Selected (%)
μi¯ p < 0.001 100% p < 0.001 100%
σμi p < 0.001 3% p < 0.001 0%
σi¯ p < 0.001 0% p < 0.001 94% p = 0.013 0%
σσi p < 0.001 0% p < 0.001 3% p = 0.040 0%
Si¯ p < 0.001 91% p = 0.010 0% p < 0.001 0%
σSi p = 0.136 0% p < 0.001 0% p < 0.001 0%
Ki¯ p < 0.001 9% p = 0.028 0% p < 0.001 0%
σKi p < 0.001 0% p = 0.165 0% p = 0.247 0%
CU¯ p = 0.248 0% p < 0.001 0% p = 0.468 0%
σCU p = 0.002 0% p < 0.001 0% p < 0.001 0%
|CU| p < 0.001 0% p < 0.001 0% p < 0.001 0%

Statistical significance is computed using the non-parametric two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. The percentage of times each feature is selected is computed over 33 loops of the leave-one-subject-out validation process for the best-performing configuration. Features selected consistently (>90% of times) are presented in bold and in all cases, they differ significantly between the two subject groups (p < 0.001). See Supplementary Material Table S.1 and Table S.2 for more detailed information on features.