Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;8:7688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25984-7

Table 1.

Crystallographic data of complexes [Ru(ƞ6-p-cymene)(MSal-etsc)Cl].Cl (3) and [Ru(ƞ6-p-cymene)(MSal-ptsc)Cl].Cl (4).

CCDC No. [Ru(ƞ6-p-cymene)(MSal-etsc)Cl].Cl (3) [Ru(ƞ6-p-cymene)(MSal-ptsc)Cl].Cl (4)
1570571 1570572
Empirical formula C21H28Cl2N3O2RuS C25H31Cl2N3O3RuS
Formula weight 558.49 625.56
Temperature 293 K 293 K
Wavelength 0.71073 Å 1.54184 Å
Crystal system monoclinic Monoclinic
Space group P21/n P 21/c
a 9.9066(4) Å 13.39352(8) Å
b 14.3359(4) Å 11.20615(8) Å
c 17.9298(6) Å 18.31082(11) Å
α 90° 90°
β 92.228(4)° 97.7958(6)°
γ 90° 90°
Volume 2544.46(16) 2722.87(3)
Z 4 4
Calculated density 1.458 Mg/m3 1.526 Mg/m3
Absorption coefficient 0.929 mm−1 7.441 mm−1
F(000) 1140.0 1280.0
Crystal size 0.22 × 0.16 × 0.1 mm3 0.15 × 0.12 × 0.06 mm3
Theta range for data collection 3.326 to 28.548° 4.638 to 70.943°
Limiting indices −13 ≤ h ≤ 12, −19 ≤ k ≤ 17, −23 ≤ l ≤ 23 −16 ≤ h ≤ 16, −13 ≤ k ≤ 12, −22 ≤ l ≤ 22
Reflections collected/unique 56198/5893 [Rint = 0.0662] 30138/5223 [Rint = 0.0214]
Completeness to theta 24.66 99.67% 64.99 99.96%
Absorption correction Semi-empirical from equivalents Semi-empirical from equivalents
Max. and min. transmission 1.00000 and 0.69503 1.00000 and 0.67976
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2 Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters 5893/4/282 5223/0/321
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.058 1.042
Final R indices [I > 2sigma(I)] R1 = 0.0615, wR2 = 0.1032 R1 = 0.0203, wR2 = 0.0524
R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1058, wR2 = 0.1162 R1 = 0.0214, wR2 = 0.0531
Largest diff. peak and hole 0.69 and −0.77 0.67 and −0.45