Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;8:7733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26092-2

Table 1.

Comparison of the native and non-native niches for Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti. Niche overlap was calculated as Schoener’s D comparing the niches in range 1 (R1) and range 2 (R2).

Range 1 Range 2 Niche overlap (D) Niche similarity Niche equivalency
R1 → R2 R2 → R1
Aedes albopictus
Asia† Europe 0.03 ns ns different*
Asia† Africa 0.16 ns ns different*
Asia† North America 0.09 similar* ns different*
Asia† South America 0.11 ns ns different*
Europe Africa 0 ns ns different*
Europe North America 0.25 similar* similar* ns
Europe South America 0.02 ns ns different*
Africa North America 0.01 ns ns different*
Africa South America 0.16 ns similar* different*
North America South America 0.36 ns ns different*
Aedes aegypti
Africa† Asia 0.27 similar* similar* different*
Africa† North America 0.18 ns ns ns
Africa† South America 0.18 ns ns ns
Asia North America 0.31 similar* similar* different*
Asia South America 0.28 similar* similar* different*
North America South America 0.45 ns ns ns

Native range.

ns = not significant.

*The ecological niches are significantly (α = 5%) more similar (similarity test) or different (equivalency test) than expected by chance.