Table 1.
Experiment | Treatment vs control | Trialsa (replicates within each trial) | Blood-fed females (n) | Gravid females (n) | Oviposited females (n) | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-valueb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DI control vs DI control | 2 (6) | 12 | 10 | 3 | 1.0 (0.2–4.1) | 0.9890 |
2 | Field water vs DI control | 2 (6) | 12 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1.0000 |
3 | Sympatric mud vs DI control | 2 (6) | 12 | 11 | 6 | 4.4 (1.7–11.8) | 0.0042 |
4 | WTD manure vs DI control | 2 (7) | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0.4 (0.1–2.0) | 0.2500 |
5 | Moss vs DI control | 2 (8–9) | 17 | 11 | 11 | 9.3 (1.5–59.0) | 0.0320 |
6 | Combined substrates vs DI control | 3 (5–6) | 17 | 13 | 5 | 6.6 (2.3–19.2) | 0.0014 |
7 | Sympatric mud + WTD manure vs Sympatric mud | 5 (5–6) | 27 | 21 | 7 | 0.67 (0.2–2.6) | 0.5700 |
8 | Sympatric mud vs Allopatric mud | 2 (6–8) | 14 | 13 | 6 | 6.2 (2.2–19.2) | 0.0007 |
aTrials within an experiment were not significantly different (P > 0.05)
bSignificant P-values (odds ratio) shown in bold (P < 0.05)
Abbreviations: WTD white-tailed deer, CI confidence interval