Table 5. Assessment of dating error for the clock (CL) and UCLN (UC) analyses of the simulated ucln data.
Dataset | Height | Lower | Higher | Nodes (%) | Error | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | UC | CL | UC | CL | UC | CL | UC | CL | UC | |
BIR | 1.26 | 3.21 | 1.26 | 6.43 | 1.37 | 1.52 | .26 | .51 | 2.64 | 7.95 |
CAR | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.89 | 1.59 | 0.68 | 0.58 | .17 | .75 | 1.57 | 2.17 |
CARY | 2.29 | 3.51 | 2.37 | 8.98 | 2.38 | 4.97 | .21 | .77 | 4.75 | 13.95 |
HYM | 0.14 | 0.91 | 0.61 | 3.01 | 0.61 | 1.58 | 1. | .89 | 1.22 | 4.65 |
MIL | 0.14 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 1.6 | 0.57 | 1.17 | 1. | .91 | 0.89 | 2.77 |
VIT | 0.29 | 1.12 | 0.82 | 2.43 | 0.29 | 0.73 | .88 | .56 | 1.11 | 3.16 |