Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;7:e34779. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34779

Table 3. Relationship between width of generalisation from aversive feedback (σA value estimates) and questionnaire total scores.

Each line represents the results of a separate model, as questionnaire scores were significantly collinear. STAI, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (trait scale); AMI, Apathy Motivation Index; OCI-R, Obsessive-Compulsive Index (Revised); PHQ9, Physician’s Health Questionnaire 9 (a brief measure of mood disorder symptoms); BIS-11, Barratt Impulsivity Scale (version 11); CSQ global, Cognitive Style Questionnaire cognitive globalisation score. SE, standard error. *p<0.010 (Nyholt-Bonferroni corrected p value for multiple tests on non-independent data, alpha = 0.05).

Questionnaire measure β SE t p
STAI total 0.039 0.015 2.626 0.009*
AMI total −0.051 0.014 −3.687 <0.001*
OCI-R total 0.005 0.014 0.373 0.710
PHQ9 total 0.021 0.015 1.476 0.141
BIS-11 total −0.005 0.013 −0.410 0.682
CSQ global −0.014 0.014 −0.978 0.328