Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):1011–1025. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-12-0282

Table 4.

Summary of repeated measures analyses of variance for referent identification.

Source F df p ηp2
Main effects
Phonotactic probability 26.41 1, 110 < .001 .19
Neighborhood density 2.00 1, 110 .160 .02
Group 14.36 2, 110 < .001 .21
Phonotactic Probability × Group 13.67 2, 110 < .001 .20
Neighborhood Density × Group 3.37 2, 110 .038 .06
Phonotactic Probability × Neighborhood Density 8.50 1, 110 .004 .07
Phonotactic Probability × Neighborhood Density × Group 2.52 2, 100 .085 .04
Post hoc effects, by group
AM
 Phonotactic probability 5.76 1, 38 .021 .13
 Neighborhood density 0.00 1, 38 .962 .00
 Phonotactic Probability × Neighborhood Density 0.99 1, 38 .324 .03
VM
 Phonotactic probability 35.19 1, 32 < .001 .52
 Neighborhood density 0.12 1, 32 .732 .00
 Phonotactic Probability × Neighborhood Density 6.73 1, 32 .014 .17
SLI
 Phonotactic probability 0.05 1, 40 .822 .00
 Neighborhood density 7.72 1, 40 .008 .16
 Phonotactic Probability × Neighborhood Density 0.73 1, 40 .40 .02

Note. AM = age-matched group; VM = vocabulary-matched group; SLI = specific language impairment group.