Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;33(3):369–379. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7

Table 2.

Differences between tools—presence of residue

Parameter Videofluoroscopy FEES P < 0.001
Consistency % Consistency % P
Percentage of positive responses for presence of neopharynx residue Thin liquids 100%
24/30
Thin liquids 23.3%
0/0
0.001*
N/A
Puree 83.3%
25/29
Puree 6.6%
0/0
0.001*
N/A
Soft 86.6%
20/28
Soft 13.3%
2/2
0.001*
1.0
Solid 80%
24/30
Solid 6.6%
0/0
0.001*
N/A
Percentage of positive responses for presence of voice prosthesis residue Thin liquids 73.3%
22/30
Thin liquids 80%
25/28
0.18
0.5
Puree 90%
27/30
Puree 0%
27/27
0.001*
0.3
Soft 80%
24/30
Soft 93%
25/26
0.22
0.4
Solid 66.6%
21/30
Solid 93.3%
27/27
0.39
0.008
Percentage of positive responses for presence of upper esophageal residue Thin liquids 90%
27/30
Thin liquids 93.3%
26/28
1.0
1.0
Puree 96.6%
29/30
Puree 93.3%
27/27
1.0
1.0
Soft 80%
24/30
Soft 93.3%
24/26
0.75
0.3
Solid 66.6%
20/30
Solid 96.6%
29/29
0.001*
0.002

Missing values removed. Proportions are expressed as number positive/number rated