Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;33(3):369–379. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7

Table 3.

Differences between tools—degree of residue

Parameter Mean difference* (95 CI) t –test P value < 0.05 Limits of agreement (mm)
Degree of neopharynx residue Thin liquids
N = 1
− 10.98 (− 16.90, − 5.05)
N/A
0.001 
N/A
− 42.09 LL to 20.12 UL
N/A
Puree
N = 1
− 20.11 (− 28.67, − 11.55)
N/A
0.001 
N/A
− 65.03 LL to 24.81 UL
N/A
Soft
N = 2
− 14.55 (− 23.74, − 5.36)
+ 20.5 (60.34)
− 521.5 to + 562.6
0.003
0.7
− 62.79 LL to 33.69 UL
− 97.8 to + 138.8
Solid
N = 2
− 19.44 (− 29.72, − 9.17)
+ 35.1 (42.78)
− 349.3 to + 419.4
0.001
0.5
34.48 LL to 73.36 UL
− 48.7 to + 118.9
Degree of voice prosthesis residue Thin liquids
N = 28
22.03 (13.93, 30.12)
+ 27.0 (24.48)
+ 17.5 to + 36.5
0.001
< 0.001
− 20.26 LL to 64.42 UL
− 21.0 to + 75.0
Puree
N = 29
0.72 (− 7.51, − 8.95)
+ 3.8 (25.12)
− 5.80 to + 13.31
0.859
0.4
42.48 LL to 43.93 UL
− 45.4 to + 53.0
Soft
N = 28
9.11 (− 0.87, 19.1)
+ 16.5 (28.78)
+ 5.3 to + 27.6
0.72
0.005
− 43.3 LL to 61.52 UL
− 39.9 to + 72.9
Solid
N = 28
5.88 (− 3.46, 15.22)
+ 8.6 (26.90)
− 1.9 to + 19.0
0.21
0.1
− 43.16 LL to 54.92 UL
− 44.1 to + 61.3
Degree of esophageal residue Thin liquids
N = 28
18.58 (11.76, 25.39)
+ 28.6 (22.97)
+ 19.7 to + 37.5
0.00
< 0.001
− 17.19 LL to 54.36 UL
− 16.4 to + 73.6
Puree
N = 29
5.57 (− 72, 11.85)
+ 10.8 (3.73)
+ 3.2 to + 18.4
0.81
0.007
− 27.05 LL to 38.19 UL
+ 3.5 to + 18.1
Soft
N = 27
10.3 (2.32, 18.28)
+ 18.0 (21.96)
+ 9.3 to +26.7
0.13
< 0.001
− 31.6 to 52.2 UL
− 25 to + 61.0
Solid
N = 29
7.93 (0.14, 15.72)
+ 10.0 (21.09)
+ 2.0 to + 18.0
0.046
0.02
32.95 (LL) to 48.81 UL
− 31.3 to + 51.3

*Mean difference = mean visual analogue scale measurement for FEES – mean visual analogue scale measurement for VF. Min–Max = 0–100 with a higher score meaning more residue. A positive difference = a higher score from FEES; a negative difference = a higher score from VF

LL lower limit, UL upper limit, VF videofluoroscopy, FEES Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallow