Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;9:923. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00923

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Patient Age (years) Sex (M/F) Müller scoreb SPT peanut (mm) Subjective eliciting dose (ED) (mg) Objective ED (mg) CAP peanut (kU/L)
N01 41 F 2 3+ 10 1.7
N02 37 M 4 3+ 0.1 300 44
N03 45 M 2 4+ 100 1.8
N04 50 F 3 4+ 10 10 12
N05 35 F 4 4+ 0.1 85
N06a 27 F 2 4+ 4 40 12.8
N07a 42 M 3 5+ Not known 300 42.7
N08 24 M 1 4+ 100 >3,000 1.9
N09 24 F 3 3+ Not known >3,000 1
N10a 18 F 3 4+ 300 1,000 >100
N11 32 F 2 4+ 10 3,000 No data
N12a 27 M 3 5+ 0.1 1,000 66
N13 25 M 1 3+ 10 11.2
N14a 26 F 2 4+ 0.1 100 9.7
N15 34 F 2 4+ 40 12,000 1.55

Age, sex, Müller score, skin prick test (SPT), results of double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), and specific IgE per peanut-allergic subject.

aSubjects that visited a second time.

bMüller score 0: symptoms oral cavity, 1: symptoms of the skins and mucous membranes 2: gastro-intestinal symptoms, 3: respiratory symptoms, 4: cardiovascular symptoms.

SPT (mm). Diameter of 3 mm (3+) is considered positive. All patients underwent a DBPCFC, subjective, and objective effective doses are displayed.