Skip to main content
. 2018 May 18;5(3):031411. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.031411

Table 1.

Time comparisons for novices and experts during specific segment intervals and imaging planes used during the simulation. The analysis of preset to ready and ready to completion combined both sagittal and axial events.

Event Interval Expert Average Time (s) 95% Confidence Interval Novice Average Time (s) 95% Confidence Interval F-statistic Significance
Pretest to ready 20.48 18.137 to 22.822 44.11 38.540 to 49.684 54.741a p<0.05
Ready to completion 17.76 15.328 to 20.189 30.57 24.797 to 36.346 14.978a p<0.05
Axial image (ready to completion) 16.6 10.880 to 22.405 26.6 21.205 to 31.915 6.232b p=0.014
Sagittal image (ready to completion) 19.99 11.842 to 28.141 38.6 31.021 to 46.168 10.693b p=0.001
a

One-way ANOVA with F(1,121).

b

Two-way ANOVA with F(1,121) using SPSS.