Skip to main content
. 2018 Winter;17(Suppl):110–121.

Table 4.

Changes of dependent variables (plasma levels of glycemic and insulinemic biomarkers) with BV supplementation in women with BBD

Variable Placebo group BV group P- value b
Insulin (U/mL)
Model 1c 0.54 ± 0.02a 0.55 ± 0.02 0.783
Model 2 d 0.54 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.2 0.669
C-peptide (ng/mL)
Model 1 2.97 ± 0.07 3.33 ± 0.12 0.029
Model 2 2.96 ± 0.07 3.35 ± 0.13 0.018
FBS (mg/dL)
Model 1 87.64 ± 0.40 94.70 ± 1.24 < 0.001
Model 2 87.70 ± 0.41 94.20 ± 1.44 < 0.001
HOMA-IR e
Model 1 0.13 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.01 0.183
Model 2 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 0.633
HOMB f
Model 1 666 ± 78 973 ± 147 0.114
Model 2 664 ± 76 977 ± 142 0.048
QUIKI g
Model 1 0.66 ± 0.01 0.65 ± 0.01 0.447
Model 2 0.66 ± 0.01 0.65 ± 0.01 0.359
G:I ratio h
Model 1 0.62 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.02 0.697
Model 2 0.62 ± 0.01 0.63 ± 0.01 0.252
a

All data are expressed in geometric mean ± S.E..

b

  This p-value obtained from performing ANCOVA.

c

  Weighted least square was performed in ANOVA with adjustment for baseline variable (model 1).

d

  Model 2 obtained from performing ANCOVA after adjustment for the frequency of lactation (n) and BMI (kg/m2) at baseline in addition to baseline variable.

e

  Homeostatic model assessment.

f

  Assessment of B-cell functionality.

g

  quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.

h

  Glucose to insulin ratio.