Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;111(5):167–174. doi: 10.1177/0141076818765779

Table 2.

Logistic regression with ever prescribing homeopathy as the binary outcome and various prescribing and other general practitioner quality measures as the predictive variables.

Quartile boundaries % of practices prescribing homeopathy Univariable odds ratio 95% confidence interval Multivariable odds ratioa 95% confidence interval
Composite measure score (lower percentile is better) <40.3 5.0% Reference Reference
40.3 to 46.0 7.8% 1.6 1.2 2.1 1.4 1.1 1.9
46.0 to 51.4 8.9% 1.8 1.4 2.4 1.5 1.2 2.0
>51.4 12.3% 2.7 2.1 3.4 2.1 1.6 2.8
Aggregate savings from measures (£ per month) <£3.4k 3.9% Reference Reference
£3.4k to £6.4k 7.7% 2.1 1.5 2.7 1.9 1.4 2.6
£6.4k to £11.0k 9.4% 2.6 1.9 3.4 2.2 1.7 3.0
>£11.0k 13.4% 3.8 2.9 5.0 2.9 2.1 4.1
Total low-value prescribing cost <£7.6k 3.9% Reference Reference
£7.6k to £15.5k 7.0% 1.9 1.4 2.5 1.7 1.3 2.3
£15.5k to £27.6k 10.3% 2.8 2.1 3.7 2.4 1.8 3.2
>£27.6 12.8% 3.6 2.8 4.7 2.6 1.9 3.6
Aggregate price-per-unit savings <£26.0k 3.5% Reference Reference
£26.0k to £45.2k 8.0% 2.4 1.8 3.3 2.2 1.7 3.0
£45.2k to £71.8k 9.7% 3.0 2.2 4.0 2.5 1.8 3.4
>£71.8k 12.7% 4.0 3.1 5.3 2.8 1.9 3.9
Quality outcomes framework score <528 8.4% Reference Reference
528 to 546 8.4% 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.1
546 to 555 8.5% 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.1
>555 8.6% 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.8 0.7 1.1
% of patients recommending practices <70.1% 8.4% Reference Reference
70.1 to 79.3% 7.8% 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.1
79.3 to 86.9% 9.8% 1.2 0.9 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.4
>86.9% 8.0% 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.2

QOF: quality outcomes framework; GP: general practitioner.

a

Adjusted for: index of multiple deprivation, % of patients with a long-term health condition, % of patients aged over 65 years, % of patients recommending practices, dispensing practice (yes or no), total items prescribed within the last six months.