Table 5.
First Author (date) | n | Session min.a | MI type | Target Behavior | Follow-up Time point | Effect Size (r) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apodaca (2013)b | 195 | 49.98 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome – MI | .04 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome – MI | −.03 | ||||||
Empathy to Outcome - MI+SO | 167 | 47.26 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | −.06 | |
MI Spirit to Outcome - MI+SO | −.01 | ||||||
| |||||||
Apodaca (2014)b | 92 | 53.40 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.05 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.03 | ||||||
| |||||||
Bertholet (2014)/Saitz (2007) | 124 | 25.50 | MI/BMI | poly-drug | 7+ mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .06 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .03 | ||||||
| |||||||
Borsari Site 1 (2015) | 91 | 46.93 | BASICS | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.28* | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.30* | ||||||
| |||||||
Borsari Site 2 (2015) | 160 | 52.68 | BASICS | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.13 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.18* | ||||||
| |||||||
Feldstein Ewing (2015)c | 65 | 60.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.17 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.18 | ||||||
| |||||||
Gaume (2008 a, b & 2009) | 97 | 15.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 7+ mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.24* | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.16 | ||||||
| |||||||
Gaume (2010 & 2013) | 149 | 25.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .06 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .04 | ||||||
| |||||||
Gaume (2016) | 208 | 25.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .01 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .02 | ||||||
| |||||||
Kahler (2016) | 90 | 63.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .07 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .09 | ||||||
| |||||||
Kaplan (2013)c | 33 | 25.20 | MI/BMI | medication adherence | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .28 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .31† | ||||||
| |||||||
Knittle (2014) | 27 | 33.10 | MI/BMI | physical activity | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.09 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.19 | ||||||
| |||||||
Lee (2013)c, d | 47 | 60.00 | MI/BMI | other drug | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .06 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .00 | ||||||
| |||||||
Mastroleo (2014)c | 53 | 32.20 | BASICS | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .13 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .23 | ||||||
| |||||||
McCambridge (2011)c | 73 | 27.00 | MI/BMI | other drug | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .01 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.13 | ||||||
| |||||||
Pirlott (2012) | 43 | 45.00 | MI/BMI | nutrition | 7+ mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.19 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.14 | ||||||
| |||||||
Tollison (2008)c | 53 | 60.00 | BASICS | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | .17 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | −.01 | ||||||
| |||||||
Tollison (2013)c | 302 | 52.50 | BASICS | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome | −.05 | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome | .02 | ||||||
| |||||||
Vader (2010) | 30 | 45.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | ||
Empathy to Outcome - MIF | −.34† | ||||||
MI Spirit to Outcome - MIF | −.31 | ||||||
Empathy to Outcome - MIO | 30 | 45.00 | MI/BMI | alcohol | 0-6 mo | −.05 | |
MI Spirit to Outcome - MIO | .09 |
Notes.
p < .001;
p < .005;
p < .05;
p < .10.
mo = month; wk = week; min = minutes; CT = change talk; MI = motivational interviewing; MICO = MI consistent; MIIN = MI inconsistent; MI+SO = MI with significant-other participation; MIF =MI with feedback; MIO = MI other.
Session length in minutes based on published report or target session length.
Trimmed estimate with study removed due to less than fair interrater reliability is (r = −.04, 95% CI [−.10, .03]; p = .242, k = 18, Q > .05).
Study used a measure to code in-session behaviors other than MISC [e.g. MITI 2.0 (Moyers et al., 2005), 3.0 (Moyers et al., 2007), 3.1.1 (Moyers et al., 2010), PEPA (Mastroleo, 2009)].
Included study as part of a larger observational measurement development project (Atkins et al., 2014).