Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2015 Jul 13;54(15):7579–7592. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01163

Table 6.

Main Electronic Configurations of Metal–Chromium Complexes and Formal versus Effective Bond Orders (FBOs vs EBOs)

MCr complex main electronic configuration %a rb FBO EBO
(d–d)9
CrCr (2′) σ2π4δ2(Cr dxy)1 42 0.82 4 2.71
(d–d)10
CrCr (2red′) σ2π4δ4 60 0.74 5 3.99
MnCr (3′) σ2π4δ4 55 0.78 5 3.85
FeCr (4ox′) σ2π4(Fe dxy, dx2y2)4 55 0.84 3 2.21
(d–d)11
MnCr (3red′) σ2π4(Mn dxy, dx2y2)4(Cr dxy)1 64 0.79 3 2.39
FeCr (4′) σ2π4(Fe dxy, dx2y2)4(Cr dxy)1 58 0.83 3 2.15
(d–d)12
FeCr (4red′) σ2π4(Fe dxy, dx2y2)4(Cr dxy)2 60 0.84 3 2.35
a

Percentage of the ground-state wave function that is described by the main configuration.

b

Formal shortness ratio (experimentally determined; see text for definition).