Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 30;115(20):5229–5234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721629115

Table 1.

AICc values and weights for all HRM models

No. of rate classes No. of parameters AICc ΔAICc AICc weight, %
1 2 3,231.25 770.0 0.0
2 8 2,597.78 136.5 0.0
3 14 2,461.25 0 74.8
4 20 2,463.44 2.2 25.1
5 26 2,473.79 12.5 0.1

Table of the five different HRMs explored to analyze our AM fungal association data (Methods). We used AICc weights to determine the model with the best fit (bold).