Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2018 Jan 8;90(3):1870–1880. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03949

Table 2.

Calibration and Validation Results for the Model Proteins

QC accuracy (%)/CV (%)
protein matrix LODa (ng/mL) linearity range (ng/mL) r2 low medium high
FcRn rat liver 13.8 20–20 000 0.990 86.7/16.9 98.7/10.6 109/10.7
anti-HCV rat plasma 25.2 40–40 000 0.995 97.6/11.3 93.5/15.6 91.8/13.6
cTnI swine plasma   0.05b 0.1–100 0.991 86.6/20.3 118/13.8 98.2/10.6
IL-33 rat tumor   4.81 10–10 000 0.991 105/15.6 95.6/14.9 91.9/12.3
CD30 rat tumor 23.6 50–50 000 0.983 92.6/13.2 89.3/12.6 91.5/9.8
cT84.66 mouse tumor 20.9c 45–45 000 0.994 93.5/10.3 86.5/9.6 92.6/8.9
anti-TNFα rat plasma 96.4d 150–150 000 0.989 85.2/18.6 91.5/13.5 97.2/10.2
CRP human plasma 19.5 40–40 000 0.990 89.5/11.3 91.5/10.3 101/15.3
CEA mouse tumor 34.6c 50–50 000 0.987 96.3/12.5 85.8/13.9 93.6/12.6
AB095 rat plasma 22.9 50–50 000 0.995 88.8/10.9 93.2/13.2 94.7/16.9
a

Limit of detection.

b

For this target, antibody enrichment was used before digestion, and SPE enrichment was used after digestion.

c

SPE enrichment was used after digestion.

d

For this antibody, no sensitive signature peptide was available.