Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gait Posture. 2018 Mar 28;62:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.044

Table 3.

Mean (SD) and [95% CI] balance and mobility scores before and after the visual feedback training. Significant within group effects of time indicated by an *, there were no significant between group differences over time.

Group Clinical Test Pre- Test 1 Pre- Test 2 Post- Test Pre1 – Pre2
p value
Pre2 - Post
p value
Experimental BESTest (%) 74.96(7.2)
[71.6–78.3]
75.9(7.7)
[72.3–79.5]
79.2(6.1)
[76.4–82.1]
p =0.944 p =0.031*
Mini- BESTest 20.2(2.9)
[18.8–21.5]
20.3(3.1)
[18.8–21.7]
21.9(2.7)
[20.6–23.2]
p =1.000 p =0.019*
BBS 51.5(3.1)
[50.0–52.9]
51.7(3.8)
[49.9–53.4]
52.5(2.7)
[51.2–53.8]
p =0.999 p =0.678
ABC (%) 76.9(18.3)
[68.3–85.4]
77.7(18.9)
[68.9–86.6]
77.1(18.1)
[68.6–85.6]
p =1.000 p =1.000
TUG(sec) 10.9(2.8)
[9.5–11.1]
10.6(3.1)
[9.2–10.9]
10.1(2.9)
[8.7–10.7]
p =0.902 p =0.646
6MWT(m) 369.7(67.9)
[337.9–401.5]
380.7(74.2)
[346.0–415.4]
387.8(70.8)
[354.7–420.9]
p =0.806 p =0.964
Control BESTest(%) 75.22(7.3)
[71.8–78.7]
76 (7.6) [72.4–
79.6]
77.7(7.0)
[74.4–81.0]
p =0.977 p =0.580
Mini- BESTest 20.3(3.7)
[18.6– 22.0]
20.6(4.1)
[18.7– 22.5]
21.6(3.3)
[20.0- 23.2]
p =0.991 p =0.360
BBS 50.9(3.9)
[49.0–52.7]
51.2(3.1)
[49.7–52.7]
51.9(3.4)
[50.3–53.4]
p =0.990 p =0.867
ABC (%) 83.2(12.6)
[77.3–89.0]
80.5(14.3)
[73.8–87.2]
79.1(20.2)
[69.6–88.5]
p =0.939 p =0.996
TUG(sec) 11.3(3.2)
[10.1–13.2]
11.1(3.3)
[9.7–12.4]
11.2(2.9)
[9.6–11.9]
p =0.984 p =1.000
6MWT(m) 374.5(76.1)
[338.9–410.2]
370.8(94.8)
[326.5–415.2]
377.6(88.9)
[336.0–419.2]
p =0.998 p =0.971