Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;9:937. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00937

Table 4.

Comparison of the results obtained from 35 selected samples using conventional PCR and qPCR.

Samples No. qPCRa (MiCV copies/g DNA) Conventional PCR
INFECTED MINKS
1 1.64 × 108 +
2 8.23 × 105
3 3.09 × 108 +
4 1.26 × 105
5 3.50 × 106 +
6 3.05 × 106 +
7 4.88 × 105
8 1.10 × 106 +
9 6.18 × 105
10 3.31 × 109 +
11 3.36 × 107 +
12 3.75 × 108 +
13 2.33 × 108 +
14 1.29 × 109 +
15 1.60 × 107 +
16 1.14 × 107 +
17 1.75 × 105
18 2.14 × 109 +
19 2.98 × 107 +
20 5.76 × 105
21 1.59 × 108 +
22 5.11 × 105
23 1.48 × 108 +
24 7.28 × 106 +
25 2.53 × 108 +
26 4.51 × 105
27 2.59 × 105
28 3.60 × 108 +
29 6.53 × 107 +
30 5.33 × 107 +
31 4.96 × 108 +
32 6.28 × 107 +
UNINFECTED MINKS
1 0
2 0
3 0

(+) detected as positive by conventional PCR.

(−) detected as negative by conventional PCR.

a

Means of triplicate copy number.