Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 19;11(4):511–518. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.511-518

Table-4.

Univariate association between brucellosis positivity and potential risk factors in goats in Khartoum state (AprilJuly 2012).

Risk factors Number of tested (%) df Χ2 p-value
Herd size
  ≤10 animals 68 (2.90) 2 6.59 0.04
  1050 animals 141 (14.9)
  >50 animals 98 (12.2)
P of P
  Meat 0 (0.00) 2 - -
  Milk 181 (10.5)
  Mixed 126 (12.7)
Veterinary services
  Inaccessible 192 (13.5) 1 2.32 0.13
  Accessible 115 (7.80)
Grazing
  No 187 (11.8) 1 0.06 0.80
  Yes 120 (10.8)
FE and/or AR
  Purchased 51 (2.00) 1 5.39 0.02
  Raised in farm 256 (13.3)
Water source
  Common canal 76 (13.2) 2 1.80 0.41
  Well 130 (13.1)
  Tap water 101 (7.90)
PS
  Extensive 131 (11.5) 1 0.001 0.98
  Intensive 176 (11.4)
Feed source
  Farm 30 (16.7) 3 - -
  Market 242 (12.4)
  Food remain 0 (0.00)
  Mixed 35 (0.00)
SOM for breeding
  No 190 (11.1) 1 0.06 0.81
  Yes 117 (12.0)
D of FM
  No 14 (21.4) 1 1.46 0.23
  Yes 293 (10.9)
Vaccination
  No 307 (11.4) 1 - -
  Yes 0 (0.00)
Parturition pen
  No 307 (11.4) 1 - -
  Yes 0 (0.00)
C with other As
  No 89 (11.2) 1 0.03 0.95
  Yes 218 (11.5)
Stray dogs
  No 148 (9.50) 1 1.06 0.30
  Yes 159 (13.2)

No=Number, CI=Confidence interval, P of P=Purpose of production, FE and/or AR=Flock expansion and/or animal replacement, PS=Production system, SOM for breeding=Share one male for breeding between farms/flocks, D of FM=Disposal of fetal membranes, C with other As=Contact with other animals, -=Constant category (ies)