Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 9;46(9):4783–4793. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky139

Table 1. The clustering results of 10 well-known motif families.

Motif name Cluster ID # of true instances Cluster size Precision (%) # of variations
GNAA HL1 85 87 98 5
GNGA HL3 45 45 100 14
T-loop HL4 29 31 94 55(6)
Sarcin-ricin IL3 47 56 84 18(14)
Kink-turn IL5 25 39 64 38
Hook-turn IL6 26 31 84 0
C-loop IL8 16 21 76 7
E-loop IL9 16 21 76 7
Tandem shear IL13 22 30 73 5
Reverse kink-turn IL21 19 20 95 6

The numbers in the brackets show the variations detected from the datasets not containing the clusters.