Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;5(2):137–149. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny006

Table IV.

Corresponding percentage of each type of AD with coexisting cam, pincer and combined deformities and without coexisting FAI-related findings compared with all numbers of each type of AD in all patients

With coexisting cam deformity With coexisting pincer deformity With coexisting combined deformity Without coexisting FAI-related findings
Definite AD (n = 15) 53.3% (8/15) 0% (0/15) 13.3% (2/15) 33.3% (5/15)
[30.1%–75.2%] [0%–20.4%] [3.7%–37.9%] [15.2%–58.3%]
Borderline AD (n = 31) 54.8% (17/31) 6.5% (2/31) 3.2% (1/31) 35.5% (11/31)
[37.8%–70.8%] [1.8%–20.7%] [0.6%–16.2%] [21.1%–53.1%]
AD in total (definite and borderline) (n = 46) 54.3% (25/46) 4.3% (2/46) 6.5% (3/46) 34.8% (16/46)
[40.2%–67.8%] [1.2%–14.5%] [2.2%–17.5%] [22.7%–49.2%]

Data are shown as percentage [95% CI]. AD, acetabular dysplasia; FAI, femoroacetabular impingement.