Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;29(5):1280–1285. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy074

Table 1.

Distant metastatic recurrence rates calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates for each risk model

Oncotype DX TAILORx AAMC model P-G algorithm: with RS assay for AAMC Intermediates
Low risk RS < 18 (n = 703) RS < 11 (n = 250) Grade 1 and PR ≥ 1% (n = 322) AAMC Low plus Intermediates that are RS<18 (n = 739)
3.4% (95% CI 1.6% to 5.1%, nf =17) 4.0% (95% CI 0.8% to 7.2%, nf =8) 2.7% (95% CI 0.0% to 5.4%, nf =5) 3.3% (95% CI 1.4% to 5.2%, nf =16)
Intermediate risk RS 18–30 (n = 424) RS 11–25 (n = 787) Not meeting AAMC definition for low or high risk (n = 716) AAMC Intermediates with RS 18-30 (n = 257)
15.2% (95% CI 10.3% to 20.1%, nf =38) 7.3% (95% CI 4.7% to 9.9%, nf =35) 8.3% (95% CI 5.4% to 11.3%, nf =36) 12.0% (95% CI 5.8% to 18.1%, nf =15)
High risk RS > 30 (n = 141) RS > 25 (n = 231) Grade 3 or ER < 20% (n = 230) AAMC High plus Intermediates that are RS>30 (n = 272)
23.0% (95% CI 14.7% to 31.3%, nf =27) 22.9% (95% CI 15.9% to 29.9%, nf =39) 22.8% (95% CI 16.1% to 29.5%, nf =41) 24.2% (95% CI 17.9% to 30.5%, nf =51)

AAMC, The Anne Arundel Medical Center; CI, confidence interval; nf, number of recurrences; P-G, pathologic‐genomic; RS, Recurrence Score.