Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Nov 9;29(1):51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0978-8

Table 2.

Geometric means of plasma prolactin by different categories of menstrual and reproductive characteristics among postmenopausal women, the Singapore Chinese Health Study

n Geometric meana p value % Difference (p value)
Menopausal type
 Natural 403 7.00
 Other 39 7.04 0.96   0.4 (0.96)
Age at menopause, year
 < 45 40 7.52
 45–49 108 6.98
 ≥ 50 294 6.96 0.5 − 7.4 (0.4)
Age at menarche, year
 < 13 51 8.96
 13–14 184 6.90
 > 14 207 6.70 0.007 − 25.1 (0.001)
Parity
 Nulliparous 25 6.78
 Parous 417 7.02 0.8   3.5 (0.8)
Number of births
 1–2 119 7.18
 3–4 182 6.98
 ≥ 5 116 6.92 0.6 − 3.4 (0.6)
Age at first birth
 ≤ 20 85 6.84
 21–25 155 6.72
 26–30 128 7.32
 ≥ 31 49 7.58 0.2 11.0 (0.3)
Years between menarche and first birth, among parous women, quartiles
 < 9.5 168 6.76
 9.5–< 10.5 55 6.62
 10.5–< 15.5 130 7.04
 ≥ 15.5 64 8.14 0.049 20.7 (0.02)
Years from menarche to menopause, quartiles
 < 34.5 132 7.22
 34.5–< 38.5 151 6.46
 38.5–< 40.5 112 6.76
 ≥ 40.5 47 9.20 0.1 27.6 (0.009)
a

Geometric means are adjusted for age at biospecimen collection, time since last meal, and time of specimen collection

Difference of mean prolactin levels among exposure categories was assessed by F statistics obtained from linear regression models

% Difference between last versus first listed categories (e.g., other versus natural menopause, ≥ 50 versus < 45 age at menopause)