Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Nov 9;29(1):51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0978-8

Table 3.

Geometric means of plasma prolactin by different levels of lifestyle factors and dietary intake of soy and tea among postmenopausal women, the Singapore Chinese Health Study

n Geometric meana p value % Difference (p value)
Soy food, quartiles, g/kcal/day
 < 38.4 111 7.32
 38.4–< 70.2 110 6.72
 70.2–< 98.9 111 7.42
 ≥ 98.9 110 6.62 0.4 − 9.4 (0.2)
Green tea
 Nondrinker/monthly 295 7.08
 Daily 147 6.88 0.6 − 2.8 (0.6)
Black tea
 Nondrinker/monthly 295 7.08
 Daily 147 6.88 0.6 − 2.6 (0.6)
Sleep, hours/day
 ≤ 5 49 7.08
 6 120 6.42
 7 146 6.56
 8 101 8.02
 ≥ 9 26 8.88 0.005 25.3 (0.09)
Body mass index, kg/m2
 < 20 65 7.00
 20–< 24 218 7.02
 24–< 28 114 7.02
 ≥ 28 45 6.90 0.9 − 1.6 (0.9)
a

Geometric means are adjusted for age at blood draw, time since last meal, and time of specimen collection

% Difference between last versus first listed categories (e.g., fourth vs. first quartile of soy intake, daily versus nondrinker/monthly green tea intake)

Difference of mean prolactin levels among exposure categories was assessed by F statistics obtained from linear regression models