Table 4.
Least-square mean estimates, standard errors, and effect sizes comparing mid-intervention and post-intervention responses for secondary outcomes measures
| Secondary Outcomes (Mentees and Mentors) | Mid-Intervention | SE | Post-Intervention | SE | P value | Effect Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service delivery perception (/5) | ||||||
| How comfortable were you talking during your sessions? | 3.89 | 0.35 | 4.09 | 0.35 | 0.69 | 0.09 |
| How would you rate the quality of the communication during your sessions? | 4.29 | 0.15 | 4.29 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| How likely would you be to use this type of intervention if available? | 4.40 | 0.19 | 4.45 | 0.19 | 0.86 | 0.04 |
| How likely would you be to refer a family member or friend to this type of intervention? | 4.41 | 0.21 | 4.51 | 0.21 | 0.73 | 0.08 |
| How would you rate your overall satisfaction with this intervention? | 4.47 | 0.21 | 4.37 | 0.21 | 0.74 | −0.08 |
| Treatment credibility (/10) | ||||||
| How logical does this type of intervention seem to you? | 7.65 | 0.45 | 7.15 | 0.45 | 0.43 | −0.18 |
| How confident are you that this intervention will be successful for treating lupus? | 7.19 | 0.45 | 6.89 | 0.45 | 0.64 | −0.11 |
| How confident are you in recommending this intervention to a friend who has lupus? | 7.88 | 0.44 | 7.38 | 0.44 | 0.43 | −0.19 |
| How successful do you feel this intervention would be in decreasing the complications of lupus? | 7.38 | 0.56 | 6.28 | 0.56 | 0.18 | −0.32 |
All estimates are from a repeated measures, mixed-effects linear regression models controlling for mentor.