Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Dec;20(6):1508–1515. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0678-1

Table 3.

Validity and Reliability Statistics for the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument in Spanish

NLit-Sa Subscale Correlation with SAHL-Sb (Spearman’s r) Comparative Fit Index (CFI)c Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)d Entire Reliabilitye (95% Confidence Interval, CI) Internal Consistencyf (Cronbach’s alpha)
Nutrition & Health 0.412* 1.0* 0.000** 0.918 (0.849 – 0.966)### 0.667##
Energy Sources in Food 0.492** 0.970* 0.064** 0.933 (0.881 – 0.965)### 0.730##
Food Label & Numeracy 0.518** 1.0* 0.000** 0.974 (0.957 – 0.985)### 0.865###
Household Food Measurement 0.111 1.0* 0.000** 0.929 (0.863 – 0.967)### 0.630##
Food Groups 0.451** 1.0* 0.000** 0.968 (0.945 – 0.982)### 0.836###
Consumer Skills 0.284* 1.0* 0.000** 0.888 (0.787 – 0.954)### 0.608##

Entire NLit-S 0.521** 0.986* 0.031** 0.994 (0.992 – 0.996)### 0.914###
a

NLit-S=Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument-Spanish

b

SAHL-S=Short Assessment of Health Literacy-Spanish; p=<0.05*; p≤0.001**

c

CFI=Comparative Fit Index ≥0.90 indicate acceptable model fit*

d

RMSEA=Root Mean Square of Approximation ≤ 0.06 indicate acceptable model fit**

e

Entire reliability is the reliability of the entire domain.

ef

We classified reliability as follows: 0.61–0.80 is moderate reliability##, 0.81–1.0 is substantial reliability###