Table 3.
NLit-Sa Subscale | Correlation with SAHL-Sb (Spearman’s r) | Comparative Fit Index (CFI)c | Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)d | Entire Reliabilitye (95% Confidence Interval, CI) | Internal Consistencyf (Cronbach’s alpha) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nutrition & Health | 0.412* | 1.0* | 0.000** | 0.918 (0.849 – 0.966)### | 0.667## |
Energy Sources in Food | 0.492** | 0.970* | 0.064** | 0.933 (0.881 – 0.965)### | 0.730## |
Food Label & Numeracy | 0.518** | 1.0* | 0.000** | 0.974 (0.957 – 0.985)### | 0.865### |
Household Food Measurement | 0.111 | 1.0* | 0.000** | 0.929 (0.863 – 0.967)### | 0.630## |
Food Groups | 0.451** | 1.0* | 0.000** | 0.968 (0.945 – 0.982)### | 0.836### |
Consumer Skills | 0.284* | 1.0* | 0.000** | 0.888 (0.787 – 0.954)### | 0.608## |
| |||||
Entire NLit-S | 0.521** | 0.986* | 0.031** | 0.994 (0.992 – 0.996)### | 0.914### |
NLit-S=Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument-Spanish
SAHL-S=Short Assessment of Health Literacy-Spanish; p=<0.05*; p≤0.001**
CFI=Comparative Fit Index ≥0.90 indicate acceptable model fit*
RMSEA=Root Mean Square of Approximation ≤ 0.06 indicate acceptable model fit**
Entire reliability is the reliability of the entire domain.
We classified reliability as follows: 0.61–0.80 is moderate reliability##, 0.81–1.0 is substantial reliability###