Table 2.
Univariable and multivariable regression models for over-surveillance compared to appropriate surveillance
| Total Number (N) N=181 |
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
Mutually Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Male Sex | 115 (63.5%) | 1.41 (0.82–2.43) | — |
| Age at last endoscopy (per 10 years) | 63.3 ± 11.4 | 1.22 (0.90–1.48) | — |
| Caucasian Race | 170 (93.9%) | 1.09 (0.36–3.25) | — |
| Michigan referring provider for third endoscopy | |||
| University of Michigan GI | 134 (74.0%) | Ref | Ref |
| University of Michigan PCP | 43 (17.1%) | 0.48 (0.27–0.86) | 0.51 (0.27–0.95) |
| BMI > 30 kg/m2 (n=174) | 71 (40.8%) | 0.71 (0.41–1.22) | ---- |
| Long segment BE (n=157) | 43 (27.4%) | 4.09 (1.65–10.1) | 3.78 (1.51–9.46) |
| Family History of EAC (n=181) | 9 (5.0%) | 1.27 (0.34–4.84) | — |
| Year of 2nd Endoscopy | n=181 | — | |
| 2002–2005 | 37 (20.4%) | Ref | |
| 2006–2011 | 100 (55.3%) | 0.46 (0.21–0.99) | |
| >2012 | 44 (24.3%) | 1.70 (0.59–4.90) | |
| Household Income | n=170 | — | |
| $19,000–$45,000 | 20 (11.8%) | Ref | |
| $45,001–$57,600 | 28 (16.5%) | 1.4 (0.51–3.86) | |
| $57,601–$74,000 | 53 (31.2%) | 1.27 (0.52–3.07) | |
| $74,001–142,000 | 69 (40.6%) | 1.36 (0.58–3.19) | |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | — | ||
| 0 | 105 (58.0%) | Ref | |
| 1 | 33 (18.2%) | 0.75 (0.39–1.45) | |
| ≥2 | 43 (23.8%) | 2.46 (1.07–5.63) | |
| Distance to UM | n=179 | — | |
| 1 mi – 13 mi | 82 (45.8%) | Ref | |
| 14 mi – 23 mi | 51 (28.5%) | 0.60 (0.32–1.12) | |
| 24 mi – 47 mi | 29 (16.2%) | 0.85 (0.39–1.89) | |
| > 47 mi | 17 (9.5%) | 3.00 (0.65–13.8) |