Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;13:157. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2572-8

Table 2.

Comparison of sensing performance of ethanol with previously reported modified electrodes

Modified electrode Linear range (mM) LOD (mM) Sensitivity (μAmM−1 cm−2) Ref.
SnO2–ZnO 0.195–25 0.137 62.56 [62]
Polypropylene carbonate/silica 0.17–850 0.021 0.5698 [65]
Mesoporous Pd–ZnO 0.05–0.8 0.0192 33.08 [66]
Gd2O3 nanostructures 0.17–850 0.052 0.266 [69]
ZnO–CeO2 0.17–1700 0.16 0.8331 [70]
CuO nanosheets 0.17–1700 0.143 0.9722 [71]
Ni-doped SnO2 10−6–1 0.6 × 10− 6 2.3148 [72]
Mg(OH)2 nanodisks 10−4–10 73 × 10− 6 6.89 [73]
poly(1–naphthylamine) 0.78–50 1.66 [74]
Mg(OH)2 nanosheets 0.01–1000 0.005 3.991 [75]
Mesoporous Ag/α–Fe2O3 0.05–0.8 0.0154 41.27 This work
0.8–15 2.93 This work