Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;8:156. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00156

Table 1.

T-epitopes selected in silico and PvRON2 in vitro binding.

Peptide code Sequence CoreF HLA-DRB1* allele NetMHCIIpan 3.0 (%Rank) Binding percentage* IC50 μM* IC50 ratio
39147 LKPFYSLETMLMANS FYSLETMLM DRB1*0401 0.3 92.6 4.6 0.2
DRB1*0701 2.5 83.2 26.0 1.1
DRB1*1101 10.0 79.3 23.0 4.8
DRB1*1302 34.0 63.0 79.0 10.6
39148 NVRKFFLNDVSSIRH FFLNDVSSI DRB1*0401 1.0 83.0 11.9 0.6
DRB1*0701 5.0 79.9 39.7 1.7
DRB1*1101 19.0 73.8 83.4 17.5
DRB1*1302 1.4 94.2 7.4 1.0
39149 DKSFISEANSFRNEE FISEANSFR DRB1*0401 3.5 85.8 26.3 1.4
DRB1*0701 17.0 42.8 ND ND
DRB1*1101 26.0 36.5 ND ND
DRB1*1302 24.0 33.5 ND ND
39150 QTAFRKFFKKIISLG FFKKIISLG DRB1*0401 17.0 83.6 33.7 1.7
FRKFFKKII DRB1*0701 6.5 67.2 51.8 2.2
DRB1*1101 1.2 87.6 83.4 17.5
DRB1*1302 48.0 7.7 ND ND
39151 KLKYIFKRRKTMKKK FKRRKTMKK DRB1*0401 37.0 65.3 40.0 2.1
DRB1*0701 6.0 36.0 ND ND
YIFKRRKTM DRB1*1101 0.1 78.5 51.1 10.7
DRB1*1302 27.0 13.1 ND ND
39152 LFYVNLFIMSSLSRK LFIMSSLSR DRB1*0401 3.0 65.8 2.8 0.1
FIMSSLSRK DRB1*0701 2.0 11.0 ND ND
DRB1*1101 1.4 91.8 1.9 0.4
DRB1*1302 27.0 94.7 8.0 1.1
39153 MKLLQHIPANLLENI LLQHIPANLL DRB1*0401 0.5 61.2 57.0 2.9
DRB1*0701 0.1 85.4 7.5 0.3
DRB1*1101 6.5 72.7 52.1 10.9
DRB1*1302 0.1 91.9 10.7 1.4
39154 LKFIVRGNNLKFLNN IVRGNNLKF DRB1*0401 11.0 22.2 ND ND
DRB1*0701 4.5 43.7 ND ND
FIVRGNNLK DRB1*1101 3.0 24.9 ND ND
IVRGNNLKF DRB1*1302 0.2 90.1 6.5 0.9
39046 NYEIYIASSSNIYLM YIASSSNIY DRB1*0401 0.8 91.8 28.4 1.5
DRB1*0701 0.3 91.5 23.3 1.0
DRB1*1101 13.0 82.9 120.0 25.2
IYIASSSNI DRB1*1302 0.2 92.8 29.6 4.0
39047 RGPVNYHFSNYMNLD VNYHFSNYM DRB1*0401 16.0 59.8 54.5 2.8
YHFSNYMNL DRB1*0701 10.0 90.4 6.0 0.3
DRB1*1101 37.0 0.0 ND ND
VNYHFSNYM DRB1*1302 13.0 37.8 ND ND
39048 TPIIVKYDNTHAKNR IIVKYDNTHA DRB1*0401 12.0 90.7 11.9 0.6
DRB1*0701 41.0 10.5 ND ND
DRB1*1101 24.0 16.8 ND ND
DRB1*1302 8.5 3.3 ND ND

Peptide code and sequence are shown; core and %rank according to NetMHCIIpan 3.0 predicted HLA-DRB alleles and values. Binding assays and IC50 values were obtained from the methodology for all peptides. IC50 was assessed for peptides having ≥50% binding, IC50 values were expressed as ratios (IC50 peptide/IC50 control peptide), and good binders were considered when their ratio was ≤ 10. Specific peptides were selected as those having the lowest ratio value for each allele and a universal peptide had to have the lowest mean ratio value.

*

Data from this study; ND means that a peptide had less than 50% binding so that its IC50 value was not evaluated. %Rank values were considered as follows: weak binders rank ≤ 10 and strong binders ≤ 2. IC50 values were calculated for each control peptide with each DRB1* allele, the controls HA-DRB1*0401 IC50 = 19.44 μM; TT-DRB1*0701 IC50 = 23.37 μM; HA-DRB1*1101 IC50 = 4.77 μM; TT-DRB1*1302 IC50 = 7.46 μM. Peptides having a IC50 ratio ≤ 10 were considered good binders.