Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;18:21. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0153-9

Table 2.

Relationship between clinical pathological features and nodal metastases in 70 patients

Parameters Patients with nodal metastases P
Total (n = 70) Negative (n = 34) Positive (n = 36)
Age,median (range) 60 (31-80) 60 (31-76) 61 (42-80) 0.155
Gender 0.469
 Male 36 (51.4%) 19 (55.9%) 17 (47.2%)
 Female 34 (48.6%) 15 (44.1%) 19 (52.8%)
Location 0.055
 Low 33 (47.1%) 21 (61.8%) 12 (33.3%)
 Middle 27 (38.6%) 10 (29.4%) 17 (47.2%)
 High 10 (14.3%) 3 (8.8%) 7 (19.4%)
Differentiation 0.052
 Well 2 (2.9%) 2 (5.9%) 0 (0.0%)
 Moderately 56 (80.0%) 29 (85.3%) 27 (75.0%)
 Poorly 12 (17.1%) 3 (8.8%) 9 (25.0%)
T stage < 0.001
 pT1 5 (7.1%) 5 (14.7%) 0 (0.0%)
 pT2 16 (22.9%) 13 (38.2%) 3 (8.3%)
 pT3 22 (31.4%) 9 (26.5%) 13 (36.1%)
 pT4 27 (38.6%) 7 (20.6%) 20 (55.6%)

Notes: According to the distance from the most caudal border of the rectal tumor to the anal verge on MRI: low, < 5 cm; middle, 5-10 cm; high, > 10 cm; p pathological