Table 5.
Effect modification of serum retinol, retinyl palmitate, and the retinyl palmitate/retinol ratio on the association of serum 25(OH)D concentrations with lung cancer risk
| Serum 25(OH)D concentrations
|
P-interaction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||
| All lung cancer1 | ||||||
| Serum retinol | ||||||
| Below median (<66 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 39/44 | 30/37 | 34/27 | 27/34 | 0.80 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.92 (0.48-1.78) | 1.44 (0.72-2.86) | 0.98 (0.47-2.04) | ||
| Above median (≥66 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 25/29 | 44/38 | 50/48 | 49/41 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 0.97 (0.46-2.02) | 1.41 (0.70-2.82) | 1.19 (0.65-2.20) | 1.41 (0.72-2.76) | ||
| Serum retinyl palmitate | ||||||
| Below median (<3.0 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 37/51 | 33/40 | 26/28 | 23/32 | 0.80 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 1.11 (0.57-2.16) | 1.25 (0.62-2.54) | 1.03 (0.51-2.06) | ||
| Above median (≥3.0 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 27/22 | 41/35 | 58/47 | 53/43 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.77 (0.83-3.75) | 1.74 (0.91-3.36) | 1.74 (0.96-3.17) | 1.75 (0.92-3.35) | ||
| Serum retinyl palmitate/retinol ratio | ||||||
| Below median (<0.05) | N, case/control | 39/47 | 38/41 | 37/39 | 31/37 | 0.81 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 1.18 (0.61-2.29) | 1.17 (0.61-2.24) | 1.14 (0.59-2.21) | ||
| Above median (≥0.05) | N, case/control | 25/26 | 36/34 | 47/36 | 45/38 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.22 (0.61-2.46) | 1.35 (0.70-2.60) | 1.64 (0.88-3.08) | 1.51 (0.76-3.00) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Non-small cell lung cancer2 | ||||||
| Serum retinol | ||||||
| Below median (<66 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 26/44 | 18/37 | 21/27 | 13/34 | 0.43 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.84 (0.39-1.83) | 1.23 (0.56-2.68) | 0.68 (0.29-1.58) | ||
| Above median (≥66 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 17/29 | 31/38 | 33/48 | 32/41 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 0.95 (0.43-2.11) | 1.37 (0.67-2.81) | 1.16 (0.57-2.34) | 1.37 (0.66-2.82) | ||
| Serum retinyl palmitate | ||||||
| Below median (<3.0 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 28/51 | 21/40 | 15/28 | 11/32 | 0.30 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.94 (0.45-1.98) | 0.95 (0.42-2.15) | 0.66 (0.28-1.58) | ||
| Above median (≥3.0 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 15/22 | 28/35 | 39/47 | 34/43 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.16 (0.50-2.71) | 1.49 (0.73-3.05) | 1.47 (0.75-2.91) | 1.52 (0.76-3.07) | ||
| Serum retinyl palmitate/retinol ratio | ||||||
| Below median (<0.05) | N, case/control | 30/47 | 26/41 | 23/39 | 14/37 | 0.06 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.94 (0.46-1.91) | 0.86 (0.41-1.78) | 0.62 (0.28-1.39) | ||
| Above median (≥0.05) | N, case/control | 13/26 | 23/34 | 31/36 | 31/38 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 0.69 (0.30-1.59) | 1.07 (0.51-2.22) | 1.29 (0.64-2.63) | 1.30 (0.64-2.65) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma2 | ||||||
| Serum retinol | ||||||
| Below median (<66 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 23/44 | 16/37 | 19/27 | 11/34 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.84 (0.36-1.82) | 1.26 (0.56-2.82) | 0.66 (0.27-1.61) | 0.44 | |
| Above median (≥66 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 16/29 | 27/38 | 31/48 | 28/41 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.03 (0.46-2.32) | 1.35 (0.64-2.08) | 1.25 (0.61-2.57) | 1.42 (0.67-3.01) | ||
| Serum retinyl palmitate | ||||||
| Below median (<3.0 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 25/51 | 16/40 | 12/28 | 11/32 | 0.40 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.77 (0.35-1.70) | 0.80 (0.33-1.91) | 0.73 (0.30-1.77) | ||
| Above median (≥3.0 μg/dL) | N, case/control | 14/22 | 26/35 | 38/47 | 28/43 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.13 (0.47-2.70) | 1.53 (0.74-3.19) | 1.61 (0.80-3.22) | 1.44 (0.69-2.99) | ||
| Serum retinyl palmitate/retinol ratio | ||||||
| Below median (<0.05) | N, case/control | 27/47 | 22/41 | 20/39 | 13/37 | 0.06 |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Referent) | 0.85 (0.41-1.77) | 0.79 (0.37-1.69) | 0.63 (0.28-1.46) | ||
| Above median (≥0.05) | N, case/control | 12/26 | 20/34 | 30/36 | 26/38 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 0.67 (0.28-1.58) | 1.03 (0.48-2.20) | 1.41 (0.68-2.90) | 1.25 (0.60-2.62) | ||
Odds ratios were estimated by conditional logistic regression, adjusted for matching factors (age and study status), race/ethnicity, BMI, CaD Trial allocation, and season of blood draw.
Odds ratios were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for the covariates and matching factors (age and CT/OS status).